3. Concept Evaluation and Selected Concept - F-Division-2021-22/F3-Repository GitHub Wiki
Pugh chart
DESIGN OBJECTIVE | WEIGHT | DESIGN IDEA 1 | DESIGN IDEA 2 | DESIGN IDEA 3 | DESIGN IDEA 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAFTEY | 1 | ++ | + | + | Datum |
EASY OF USE | 2 | - | - | - | Datum |
PROTABILITY | 2 | + | ++ | + | Datum |
USE OF STANDARD PARTS | 9 | - | + | ++ | Datum |
COST | 2 | + + | - | - | Datum |
ACSTHETICS | 6 | + + | + | - | Datum |
INSTALLATION | 5 | - - | + | ++ | Datum |
+SCORE | 28 | 15 | 13 | 0 | |
-SCORE | 12 | 4 | 10 | 0 | |
Total | 16 | 11 | 3 | 0 |
*##JUSTIFICATION DESIGN 1;
SI.NO | OBJECTIVE | SCORE | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
1 | SAFETY | +2 | ensure safety |
2 | EASY TO USE | -2 | the lift will make it easy for the lift of ball |
3 | PROBILITY | +2 | it occupies space |
4 | USE OF STANDARD PARTS | +2 | more standard |
5 | COST | +2 | cost is more than datum |
*##DESIGN 2:
SI.NO | OBJECTIVE | SCORE | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
1 | SAFETY | -2 | it provides less saftey because use of electricity |
2 | EASE OF USE | +3 | it works automatically |
3 | PROTABILITY | +4 | it requires more space |
4 | USE OF STANDARD PARTS | +2 | easily not affordable |
5 | COST | -2 | cost is high |
*##DESIGN 3:
SI.NO | OBJECTIVE | SCORE | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
1 | SAFETY | -2 | no safety |
2 | EASE OF USE | +1 | some complication |
3 | PROTABILITY | 0 | |
4 | USE OF STANDARD PARTS | 0 | |
5 | COST | +5 | not affordable |
DESIGN 4;
SI.NO | OBJECTIVE | SCORE | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
1 | SAFETY | 0 | |
2 | EASY TO USE | 0 | |
3 | PROBILITY | 0 | |
4 | USE OF STANDARD PARTS | 0 | |
5 | COST | 0 |
THE BEST DESIGN IS DESIGN 1
*##FINAL CONCEPT