Pugh chart - F-Division-2018-2019/Team-5 GitHub Wiki
Objectives
1.Safety
2.Ease of use
3.Portability
4.Use of standard parts
5.Cost
6.Attractive
7.Efficiency
8.Less power consumption
Assigning weightage for the stated objectives
Objectives | Weightage |
---|---|
Safety | 9 |
Ease of use | 8 |
Portability | 6 |
Use of standard parts | 7 |
Cost | 6 |
Attractive | 5 |
Efficiency | 8 |
Less power consumption | 7 |
PUGH chart
Objectives | Concept1 | Concept2 | Concept3 | Concept4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Safety | dattum | - | + | ++ |
Ease of use | dattum | 0 | + | + |
Poratbility | dattum | -- | - | - |
Use of standard parts | dattum | + | - | + |
Cost | dattum | + | - | - |
Attractive | dattum | + | + | + |
Effeciency | dattum | + | ++ | ++ |
Less power consumption | dattum | + | 0 | - |
+score | 0 | 33 | 38 | 54 |
-score | 0 | -21 | -19 | -19 |
total | 0 | 12 | 19 | 35 |
Concept No. | Objective | score | justification |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Safety | dattum | |
Ease of use | dattum | ||
Portability | dattum | ||
Use of standard parts | |||
cost | dattum | ||
Attractive | dattum | ||
Efficiency | dattum | ||
Less power consumption | dattum | ||
2. | Safety | -9 | The parts are not enclosed and it could cause harm to the user |
Ease of use | 0 | it is the only design that can take a box from anywhere and keep it in the bin but it takes lot of steps to do | |
Portability | -12 | very less portable than concept 1 | |
Use of standard parts | 7 | parts are easily available like hook,joystick,dc motor | |
Cost | 6 | it is less cheaper becauseparts are not complicated and can easily available | |
Attractive | 5 | The tranportable conveyor makes the prototype more attractive | |
Efficiency | 8 | it finishes both the work of picking the box from anywhere and placing it in respective bin | |
Less power consumption | 7 | As it uses dc motor power consumed is less | |
3. | safety | 9 | All parts are enclosed in well structured body |
Ease of use | 9 | it is easily usable as it has vacuum to carry boxes | |
Portability | -6 | parts are not portable | |
Use of standard parts | -7 | parts such as vacuum,motor is easily available but digital display is not easily available in the market | |
Cost | -6 | vacuum and digital display costs more | |
Attractive | 5 | Vacuum and digital display makes the prototype attractive | |
Efficiency | 16 | finishes the work fast by sensing the shapes | |
Less power consumption | 0 | same as concept 1 | |
4. | Safety | 18 | The robotic arm do the work more safely than the remaining concept designs |
Ease of use | 8 | As mentioned above the Robotic arm can do the work easily with less manual effort | |
Portability | -6 | the prototype is not portable | |
Use of standard parts | 7 | Parts like grabber,Robotic arm,partial turn motor are easily available | |
Cost | -6 | Color sensor and Robotic arm are costly | |
Attractive | 5 | The Robotic arm makes it attractive and color sensing too | |
efficiency | 16 | It finishes the work faster as it has Robotic arm and conveyor | |
Less power consumption | -7 | The motor consumes more power than the rest 3 prototypes |
So,selected design is Conceptual design 4