Pugh chart - F-Division-2018-2019/Team-5 GitHub Wiki

Objectives

1.Safety

2.Ease of use

3.Portability

4.Use of standard parts

5.Cost

6.Attractive

7.Efficiency

8.Less power consumption

Assigning weightage for the stated objectives

Objectives Weightage
Safety 9
Ease of use 8
Portability 6
Use of standard parts 7
Cost 6
Attractive 5
Efficiency 8
Less power consumption 7

PUGH chart

Objectives Concept1 Concept2 Concept3 Concept4
Safety dattum - + ++
Ease of use dattum 0 + +
Poratbility dattum -- - -
Use of standard parts dattum + - +
Cost dattum + - -
Attractive dattum + + +
Effeciency dattum + ++ ++
Less power consumption dattum + 0 -
+score 0 33 38 54
-score 0 -21 -19 -19
total 0 12 19 35
Concept No. Objective score justification
1. Safety dattum
Ease of use dattum
Portability dattum
Use of standard parts
cost dattum
Attractive dattum
Efficiency dattum
Less power consumption dattum
2. Safety -9 The parts are not enclosed and it could cause harm to the user
Ease of use 0 it is the only design that can take a box from anywhere and keep it in the bin but it takes lot of steps to do
Portability -12 very less portable than concept 1
Use of standard parts 7 parts are easily available like hook,joystick,dc motor
Cost 6 it is less cheaper becauseparts are not complicated and can easily available
Attractive 5 The tranportable conveyor makes the prototype more attractive
Efficiency 8 it finishes both the work of picking the box from anywhere and placing it in respective bin
Less power consumption 7 As it uses dc motor power consumed is less
3. safety 9 All parts are enclosed in well structured body
Ease of use 9 it is easily usable as it has vacuum to carry boxes
Portability -6 parts are not portable
Use of standard parts -7 parts such as vacuum,motor is easily available but digital display is not easily available in the market
Cost -6 vacuum and digital display costs more
Attractive 5 Vacuum and digital display makes the prototype attractive
Efficiency 16 finishes the work fast by sensing the shapes
Less power consumption 0 same as concept 1
4. Safety 18 The robotic arm do the work more safely than the remaining concept designs
Ease of use 8 As mentioned above the Robotic arm can do the work easily with less manual effort
Portability -6 the prototype is not portable
Use of standard parts 7 Parts like grabber,Robotic arm,partial turn motor are easily available
Cost -6 Color sensor and Robotic arm are costly
Attractive 5 The Robotic arm makes it attractive and color sensing too
efficiency 16 It finishes the work faster as it has Robotic arm and conveyor
Less power consumption -7 The motor consumes more power than the rest 3 prototypes
So,selected design is Conceptual design 4