Components Code Quality Guides Best Practices - DevClusterAI/DOD-definition GitHub Wiki
Code Quality Best Practices
This guide outlines best practices for maintaining high code quality across software development projects. Following these practices helps create maintainable, reliable, and secure applications while improving developer productivity and satisfaction.
Core Principles
- Consistency: Code should follow consistent patterns and conventions
- Maintainability: Code should be designed for future maintenance
- Reliability: Code should function correctly under all expected conditions
- Security: Code should be resistant to security vulnerabilities
- Efficiency: Code should use resources effectively
- Clarity: Code should be easily understood by other developers
Coding Standards
General Guidelines
- Keep functions and methods focused on a single responsibility
- Limit function/method length to 30-50 lines where possible
- Limit file size to 300-500 lines where possible
- Maintain a consistent level of abstraction within methods
- Avoid deep nesting (more than 3-4 levels)
- Follow standard naming conventions for your language and framework
- Be explicit rather than clever
- Comment "why," not "what" or "how"
Naming Conventions
Element |
Convention |
Example |
Variables |
Descriptive, camelCase or snake_case |
userAccount or user_account |
Constants |
UPPERCASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES |
MAX_RETRY_ATTEMPTS |
Functions |
Verb phrases, camelCase |
calculateTotal() |
Classes |
Nouns, PascalCase |
UserRepository |
Interfaces |
Adjectives/nouns, PascalCase |
Serializable |
Files |
Match primary class/component name |
UserRepository.java |
Folders |
Lowercase, kebab-case |
user-management |
Language-Specific Standards
JavaScript/TypeScript
- Prefer
const
over let
where possible
- Use
===
instead of ==
for equality checks
- Use destructuring for object and array access
- Handle Promise errors with catch or try/catch
- Prefer async/await over raw Promises
- Use explicit return types in TypeScript
- Avoid
any
type in TypeScript
// Good example
const calculateDiscount = (price: number, discountPercentage: number): number => {
if (price <= 0 || discountPercentage < 0 || discountPercentage > 100) {
throw new Error('Invalid price or discount percentage');
}
return price * (1 - discountPercentage / 100);
};
// Bad example
function calcDisc(p, d) {
return p * (1 - d / 100);
}
Java
- Follow JavaBean conventions for properties
- Use interfaces to define behavior
- Prefer composition over inheritance
- Use checked exceptions only for recoverable conditions
- Implement proper equals() and hashCode() methods
- Use StringBuilder for string concatenation in loops
- Prefer primitive types over boxed primitives when possible
// Good example
public class User {
private final String name;
private final int age;
public User(String name, int age) {
this.name = Objects.requireNonNull(name, "Name cannot be null");
if (age < 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Age cannot be negative");
}
this.age = age;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public int getAge() {
return age;
}
}
// Bad example
class user {
public String name;
public int age;
}
Python
- Follow PEP 8 style guide
- Use type hints in new code
- Use context managers (with statements) for resource management
- Prefer list comprehensions for simple transformations
- Use virtual environments for dependency management
- Implement proper
__str__
and __repr__
methods
- Use docstrings for function and class documentation
# Good example
def calculate_average(numbers: list[float]) -> float:
"""Calculate the average of a list of numbers.
Args:
numbers: A list of numbers to average
Returns:
The average value
Raises:
ValueError: If the list is empty
"""
if not numbers:
raise ValueError("Cannot calculate average of empty list")
return sum(numbers) / len(numbers)
# Bad example
def calc_avg(nums):
return sum(nums) / len(nums)
Documentation Standards
Code Documentation
- Document all public APIs, classes, and methods
- Explain "why" rather than "what" in comments
- Keep comments up-to-date when code changes
- Document assumptions and edge cases
- Use standard documentation formats (JavaDoc, JSDoc, docstrings)
- Include examples for complex functionality
Project Documentation
- Maintain a comprehensive README.md with:
- Project overview and purpose
- Setup instructions
- Basic usage examples
- Link to detailed documentation
- Document architecture decisions (ADRs)
- Include developer onboarding guide
- Maintain up-to-date API documentation
- Document configuration options
Testing Practices
Test Coverage
- Aim for minimum 80% code coverage for critical components
- Cover all critical paths and business logic fully
- Test both success and failure cases
- Focus on behavior, not implementation details
- Prioritize test coverage for:
- Business-critical functionality
- Complex logic
- Error-prone areas
- Recently defective code
- Public APIs
Types of Tests
Test Type |
Purpose |
Target Coverage |
Unit Tests |
Test individual functions/methods |
70-90% |
Integration Tests |
Test interaction between components |
50-70% |
End-to-End Tests |
Test complete user workflows |
Key workflows |
Performance Tests |
Verify system performance |
Critical paths |
Security Tests |
Check for security vulnerabilities |
High-risk areas |
Test Quality
- Tests should be deterministic (no flakiness)
- One assertion/concept per test
- Use appropriate test doubles (mocks, stubs, fakes)
- Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario and expected outcome
- Follow the AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
- Avoid test interdependencies
- Maintain tests with the same care as production code
// Good test example
describe('User authentication', () => {
it('should reject login with incorrect password', async () => {
// Arrange
const user = await createTestUser({ password: 'correct-password' });
// Act
const result = await authService.login(user.email, 'wrong-password');
// Assert
expect(result.success).toBe(false);
expect(result.error).toEqual('Invalid credentials');
});
});
Code Review Practices
Review Checklist
- Does the code follow project conventions and style guides?
- Is the code DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)?
- Are edge cases handled appropriately?
- Is error handling comprehensive?
- Is the code performant for expected inputs?
- Are security considerations addressed?
- Are tests comprehensive and meaningful?
- Is documentation clear and complete?
Review Process
- Preparation: Reviewers should understand the requirements
- Scope: Keep reviews under 400 lines of code where possible
- Timing: Complete reviews within 24-48 hours of submission
- Focus: Look for issues, not just style preferences
- Tone: Be constructive and respectful in comments
- Resolution: Address or acknowledge all comments
- Learning: Use reviews as learning opportunities
Constructive Feedback
Instead of |
Try |
"This code is sloppy" |
"This could be more maintainable by..." |
"Why didn't you use X?" |
"Have you considered using X because..." |
"This is wrong" |
"This might cause an issue when..." |
"You forgot to test this" |
"Could we add a test for the scenario where..." |
Architecture and Design
Design Principles
- SOLID Principles:
- S: Single Responsibility Principle
- O: Open/Closed Principle
- L: Liskov Substitution Principle
- I: Interface Segregation Principle
- D: Dependency Inversion Principle
- DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself
- KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid
- YAGNI: You Aren't Gonna Need It
- Separation of Concerns: Different areas of functionality should be managed by distinct and minimally overlapping modules
Common Patterns
- Implement established design patterns where appropriate:
- Factory Pattern for object creation
- Strategy Pattern for interchangeable algorithms
- Observer Pattern for event handling
- Repository Pattern for data access
- Adapter Pattern for interface compatibility
Architecture Considerations
- Design for testability (dependency injection, interface-based design)
- Plan for scalability from the beginning
- Consider future extension points
- Document architectural decisions and their rationales
- Establish clear boundaries between system components
- Define explicit contracts between modules
Security Practices
Secure Coding
- Always validate and sanitize user input
- Implement proper authentication and authorization
- Use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection
- Encode output to prevent XSS attacks
- Keep dependencies up-to-date
- Follow the principle of least privilege
- Use secure defaults
- Never store sensitive data in code or version control
Common Vulnerabilities to Prevent
- Injection flaws (SQL, NoSQL, OS command injection)
- Broken authentication
- Sensitive data exposure
- XML External Entities (XXE)
- Broken access control
- Security misconfiguration
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
- Insecure deserialization
- Using components with known vulnerabilities
- Insufficient logging and monitoring
Performance Optimization
General Guidelines
- Optimize only after measuring
- Profile code to identify actual bottlenecks
- Focus on algorithms and data structures first
- Consider both time and space complexity
- Set performance budgets and monitor them
- Optimize critical paths and common operations
- Cache expensive operations where appropriate
Web-Specific Optimizations
- Minimize HTTP requests
- Enable compression
- Use appropriate image formats and sizes
- Leverage browser caching
- Minimize and bundle JavaScript and CSS
- Optimize critical rendering path
- Implement lazy loading for non-critical resources
- Use appropriate rendering strategies (SSR vs. CSR)
Continuous Integration Practices
CI Pipeline Components
- Automated builds
- Unit and integration tests
- Code quality analysis
- Security scanning
- Performance testing
- Deployment to staging environments
- Documentation generation
Quality Gates
Define quality gates to ensure code meets standards before proceeding:
Gate |
Requirements to Pass |
Build |
Code compiles without errors |
Tests |
All tests pass with expected coverage |
Static Analysis |
No high severity issues, limited medium severity issues |
Security Scan |
No critical or high vulnerabilities |
Performance |
Meets defined performance budgets |
Review |
Approved by required reviewers |
Version Control
Commit Practices
- Make small, focused commits
- Write clear, descriptive commit messages
- Follow commit message conventions (e.g., Conventional Commits)
- Reference issue numbers in commit messages
- Keep unrelated changes in separate commits
Branching Strategy
- Define a clear branching strategy (Gitflow, GitHub Flow, Trunk-based)
- Keep feature branches short-lived
- Regularly rebase or merge from main branch
- Delete branches after merging
- Protect main branches with required reviews and status checks
Pull Request Process
- Create small, focused pull requests
- Include comprehensive description and context
- Reference related issues
- Include testing instructions
- Address all review comments
- Ensure all checks pass before merging
Refactoring and Technical Debt
When to Refactor
- When adding new features to problematic code
- When fixing bugs in complex areas
- When code is difficult to understand
- When the same problems appear repeatedly
- When tests are difficult to write
- When making performance improvements
Refactoring Approaches
- Always maintain or improve test coverage when refactoring
- Make small, incremental changes where possible
- Document significant refactorings and their rationale
- Focus on high-impact, high-value areas first
- Consider the cost/benefit ratio of each refactoring
Managing Technical Debt
- Track technical debt explicitly (e.g., with TODOs or tech debt tickets)
- Allocate dedicated time for debt reduction (e.g., 20% of sprint capacity)
- Prioritize debt that impacts frequently changing code
- Address debt that affects team productivity or system stability first
- Prevent new debt through code reviews and standards
Tool Recommendations
Static Analysis
Language |
Recommended Tools |
JavaScript/TypeScript |
ESLint, SonarJS, TypeScript Compiler |
Java |
SonarJava, PMD, SpotBugs |
Python |
Pylint, Flake8, mypy |
C# |
Roslyn Analyzers, SonarC# |
Ruby |
RuboCop, Reek |
Testing Frameworks
Language |
Unit Testing |
Integration Testing |
End-to-End |
JavaScript |
Jest, Mocha |
Supertest, Jest |
Cypress, Playwright |
Java |
JUnit, TestNG |
Spring Test, Mockito |
Selenium, Cucumber |
Python |
pytest, unittest |
pytest |
Selenium, Robot Framework |
C# |
xUnit, NUnit |
Moq, xUnit |
Selenium, SpecFlow |
Ruby |
RSpec, Minitest |
RSpec |
Capybara, Cucumber |
Other Tools
- Code Formatters: Prettier, Black, google-java-format
- API Documentation: Swagger, OpenAPI, Postman
- Package Security: npm audit, OWASP Dependency Check, Snyk
- Performance: Lighthouse, JMeter, Artillery
- CI/CD: GitHub Actions, Jenkins, GitLab CI, CircleCI
Related Resources