5.CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - D-Div-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-13 GitHub Wiki

5.1 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SCORES GIVEN

TASK 1: ASSIGN WEIGHTS TO THE OBJECTIVES

Objectives Weights
Budget 8
Ease of Use 9
Portabilty 7
Safety 10
Alarm System 9
Entertaining  
<style type="text/css"></style>
Task 2 : Write Pugh chart for the 4 alternative designs shown in figures          
Design Objectives Score Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 Design 4
Budget 8 Datum ++ - --
Ease of Use 9 Datum + + +
Portabilty 7 Datum - + ++
Safety 10 Datum + + -
Notification unit 9 Datum + + -
Entertaining 8 Datum + + +
Score(+)     52 43 31
Score(-)     -7 -8 -35
Total     45 35 -4
<style type="text/css"></style>
       
Task 3 : Justification for the scores given      
Design No. Objective. Score Alloted Justification for the score alloted.
1 Budget 0 It is the Datum (reference)
  Ease of use 0 It is the Datum (reference)
  Portability 0 It is the Datum (reference)
  Safety 0 It is the Datum (reference)
  Notification Unit 0 It is the Datum (reference)
  Entertaining 0 It is the Datum (reference)
2 Budget ++ The materials used in design 2 are economic and efficient in use
  Ease of use + The Product outcome of design 2 would be very user friendly ie it can be handled easily
  Portability - Since a stand is used for portability in the design 2 it would be stationary at a point n not portable
  Safety + The components used in design 2 are highly efficient and safe to use
  Notification Unit + The notification Unit of the craddle is highly efficient to use
  Entertaining + The interactive toy used in design 2 would be better to entertain the baby and hush the baby when crying
3 Budget - The materials used in Design 3 are costly than the datum
  Ease of use + The Product outcome of design 3 would be very user friendly ie it can be handled easily
  Portability + Since a foldable stand is used in design 3 it would be easy to shift it from one place to another
  Safety + The components used in design 3 are efficient and safe to use.
  Notification Unit + The notification Unit of the craddle is highly efficient to use
  Entertaining + The teddy bear used in design 3 can be useful to the baby to play and keep the baby entertained
4 Budget -- The materials chosen in Design 4 are costly than the datum
  Ease of use + The Product outcome of design 4 would be very user friendly ie it can be handled easily
  Portability ++ Since Rubber wheels are used in design 4 it would be easy to move the craddle.
  Safety - The rubber wheels used for portability in the design 4 would not be safe on a slipery surface
  Notification Unit - The notification Unit of the craddle is highly efficient to use
  Entertaining + The musical toy used in design 4 would be better to entertain the baby and hush the baby when crying
⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️