5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - D-Div-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-12 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

Design Objectives Weights Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 Design 4
Safety 8 datum ++ + +
Ease of use 7 datum ++ - --
Portability 3 datum ++ + -
Use of standard parts 5 datum + + +
Cost 6 datum + + -
Score(+)   0 47 22 16
Score (-)   0 0 7 22
Total   0 47 15 -6

5.1 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SCORE GIVEN

Design No. Objective Score Allocated Justification for the Score
1 Safety 0 it is a reference
  Ease of Use 0 it is a reference
  Portability 0 it is a reference
  Use of Standard Parts 0 it is a reference
  Cost 0 it is a reference
2 Safety double plus very low chances of injuries
  Ease of Use double plus easy to understand and use it
  Portability double plus light weight
  Use of Standard Parts single plus as it is automatic use of standard parts is a must
  Cost single plus cost efficient
3 Safety single plus low chances of injuries
  Ease of Use single minus confusing mechanism
  Portability single plus light weight
  Use of Standard Parts single plus as it is automatic use of standard parts is a must
  Cost single plus cost efficient
4 Safety single plus low chances of injuries
  Ease of Use double minus difficult mechanism
  Portability single minus huge
  Use of Standard Parts single plus as it is automatic use of standard parts is a must
  Cost single minus not budget friendly

5.2 SELECTED DESIGN

IMG_20230120_095154

PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

5.3 FUNCTION CLUSTERING

image

5.4 SUB SYSTEM LIST

SL. No. Subsystem
1 DATA COLLECTION UNIT
2 COMFORTING UNIT
3 SWING UNIT
4 CASING UNIT

5.5 INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS

Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2 Subsystem 3 Subsystem 4
Spatial      
Data      
Material      
 
Subsystem 2 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 3 Subsystem 4
Spatial      
Data      
Material      
 
Subsystem 3 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2 Subsystem 4
Spatial      
Data      
Material      
   
Subsystem 4 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2 Subsystem 3
Spatial      
Data      
Material