Project Part 4 Feedback - CMPUT301W13T05/ClassProject GitHub Wiki
Feedback
Code base of Prototype -- Excellent (3)
- The code is clean and well organized.
- I appreciate that you implemented more than required requirements.
Tangible Demo -- Good (2)
- The presentation is not so good.
- You need better practice and speak louder.
Code Documentation -- Satisfactory (1)
- We don't document test classes since test code is used to make sure the code is correct. The other users won't care about your test codes.
- Not enough description for methods in MyApp class.
- Syntax errors exist in your description. You can improve the document by correct these errors.
- Not that easy for 3rd party to understand since you don't have description for most methods.
Test Cases -- Good (2)
- In DatabaseManagerTest: The code is not aligned, which reduce the readability.
- Some inconsistency in test cases.
OOD -- Satisfactory (1)
- The class diagram is really hard to read... lines cross with each other... no description... too small diagram...
- Where is your sequence diagram?
Release Planning -- Excellent (1)
Addressing Feedback -- Excellent (1)
Refactoring -- Good (2)
- Refactoring has been documented.
- You need to write explanation about why you did the refactoring or not.