5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - C-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-17 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

5.1 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SCORE GIVEN

Objectives Weights
Sound quality 10
having notes of octave 8
Portability 6
Cost 7
Design No. Objective Score Allocated Justification for the Score
1 sound quality 10 because the pitch pipe produces good sound and has different variations in sound
having notes of octave 8 It doesn't have any set of octaves
portability 6 because of lightweight it is easier to carry
cost 7 the cost of pitch pipe is more expensive
     
2 sound quality 0 Datum
having notes of octave 0 Datum
portability 0 Datum
cost 0 Datum
    Datum
3 sound quality 20 as it can produce octaves and different rhythms it has good quality of sound
having notes of octave 8 it has natural notes of one octave
portability 0 difficult to carry from one place to another
cost 7 it is low of cost
     
4 sound quality 20 because of the combination of mallets,cymbals and solenoids it produce good quality sound
having notes of octave -8 it does not have any set of octaves
portability 0 difficut to carry too many components
cost 7 3-4 solenoids cost too much
     

5.2 SELECTED DESIGN

image

5.3 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

5.4 FUNCTION CLUSTERING

Screenshot (33)

5.5 INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS

Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2 Subsystem 3
Spatial YES ------
Data YES ------
Material ------ ------
     
     
Subsystem 2 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 3
Spatial YES -------
Data ------ -------
Material ------ -------
     
Subsystem 3 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2
Spatial -------- -------
Data YES YES
Material -------- -------