5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHHITECTURE - B-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-10 GitHub Wiki

5.1 ASSIGN WEIGHTS TO THE OBJECTS

Objectives	Weights
Safety	10
Ease of use	9
Portability	9
Use of standard parts	6
Cost	1

5.2 PUGH CHART FOR 4 ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS SHOWN IN THE FIGURES

Design Objectives	Weights	Design 1	Design 2	Design 3	Design 4
Safety	10	Datum	+	+	++
Ease of use	9	Datum	+	+	++
Portability	9	Datum	+	+	+
Use of standard parts	6	Datum	+	+	+
Cost	1	Datum	--	-	+
Score(+)	-	0	34	34	35
Score(-)	-	0	2	1	0
Total	-	0	32	33	54

5.3 JUSTIFICATION FOR SCORE GIVEN

Design No.	Objective	Score Allotted	Justification for Score
4	Safety	20	It is safer than other designs
-	Ease of Work	18	It is the most convenient design among all 4 concepts
-	Portability	9	It is easy to carry and is lighter as compared to other concepts.
-	Use of standard parts	6	Good and precise Standard parts are used in this design which are better than concept 1
-	Cost	1	It is very cheap compared to other designs

5.4 SELECTED DESIGN

5.5 FUNCTIONAL CLUSTERING

5.6 INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CLUSTERS

TO SENCE THE CLOTH	Fold The Cloth	Indication	Dispensing Unit
Spatial	Yes	No	Yes
Data	Yes	Yes	Yes
Material	Yes	Yes	Yes

FOLD THE CLOTH	Fold The Cloth	Indication	Dispensing Unit
Spatial	Yes	No	Yes
Data	Yes	Yes	Yes
Material	Yes	Yes	Yes

INDICATION UNIT	Fold The Cloth	Indication	Dispensing Unit
Spatial	No	No	Yes
Data	Yes	Yes	Yes
Material	Yes	Yes	Yes

DISPENSING UNIT	Fold The Cloth	Indication	Dispensing Unit
Spatial	Yes	Yes	Yes
Data	Yes	Yes	Yes
Material	Yes	Yes	Yes