5.Concept Selection - B-DIV-2023-2024-ODD/B6 GitHub Wiki
5.1 Pugh chart
| Design objective |
weight |
Design 1 |
Design 2 |
Design 3 |
Design 4 |
| Safety |
9 |
- |
Datum |
- |
+ |
| Ease of use |
3 |
+ |
Datum |
- |
+ |
| Probability |
5 |
+ |
Datum |
+ |
- |
| Use of standard parts |
8 |
0 |
Datum |
- |
++ |
| Cost |
7 |
+ |
Datum |
+ |
- |
| Score(+) |
|
15 |
|
12 |
28 |
| Score(-) |
|
9 |
|
20 |
12 |
| Total |
|
6 |
|
-8 |
16 |
5.2 Justification of the scores given
| Design no. |
Objectives |
Score allocated |
Justification |
| 1 |
Power cosumption |
6 |
High power consumption |
|
Ease of use |
8 |
It can be easily used |
|
portability |
8 |
It is portable |
|
Maintenance |
9 |
High maintenance |
|
Cost |
5 |
Expensive |
| 2 |
Power cosumption |
7 |
Low power consumption |
|
Ease of use |
4 |
It cannot be easily used |
|
portability |
5 |
it is not much portable |
|
Maintenance |
8 |
High maintenence |
|
Cost |
8 |
Low cost |
| 3 |
Power cosumption |
8 |
Low power consumption |
|
Ease of use |
4 |
It cannot be easily used |
|
portability |
5 |
it is not much portable |
|
Maintenance |
6 |
Low maintenence |
|
Cost |
6 |
Affordable cost |
| 4 |
Power cosumption |
|
Datum |
|
Ease of use |
|
Datum |
|
portability |
|
Datum |
|
Maintenance |
|
Datum |
|
Cost |
|
Datum |