1.10ghz 384kb, 1.5mb, 12mb 64gb RAM

1. threads: 1, CPU%: 28%, Speed: 128H/s

2. threads: 2, CPU%: 47%, Speed: 242H.s

3. threads: 3, CPU%: 69%, Speed: 331H/s

4. threads: 4, CPU%: 85%, Speed: 377H/s

5. threads: 5, CPU%: 100%, Speed: 384H/s

6. It took 5 threads before reaching full utilization.
7. The speed does not increase after reaching 100%, I believe this is the clock stopping the CPU from running too fast and breaking.

8. threads: 1, CPU%: 28%, Speed: 127H/s

threads: 2, CPU%: 50%, Speed: 240H/s

threads: 3, CPU%: 75%, Speed: 279H/s

threads: 4, CPU%: 83%, Speed: 390H/s

threads: 5, CPU%: 100%, Speed: 395H/s

8. Youtube affected the utilization of the CPU by about 6%.
9. My Iphone: Clock speed: 3.2GHz Cores: 6 Cache: 64Gb Speeds seem to be similar, maybe a tiny bit slower on my phone rather than on a personal computer.

Sources: Apple.com https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52651987/how-to-set-ios-cache-and-disk-storage-size-and-how-does-cache-get-restored-from#:~:text=The%20memory%20cache%20is%20restricted,limited%20by%2064Gb%20or%20128Gb.

Celeron is better for tablets and other machines because it uses MUCH less power than the Xenon.

1. Xenon has a base frequency of 2.10GHz, beating the Celeron’s 1.10GHz, making it faster.
2. Xenon has 24 cores, allowing it to complete many tasks at once, while the Celeron only has 5 cores.