CMI 5 Working Group Meeting Minutes – April 29th, 2022 - AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current GitHub Wiki

cmi5 Working Group Meeting Minutes – April 29nd, 2022

Attendee List

  • Bill McDonald (Working Group Leader)
  • Andy Johnson (ADL)
  • Henry Ryng (InXSOL)
  • Martin Koob ()
  • Geir Fuhre Pettersen (Conexus)
  • James Taite (DLA Training)
  • Christopher Thompson (Medcom, Inc.)
  • Matt Westover (EZ Consulting)
  • Carsten König (TUTORize GmbH)
  • Russ Engoran ()

Notes

CATAPULT Issues

The group discussed the following CATAPULT Issue:

This issue was discussed at length at the cmi5 working group meeting today (4/29/2022). The current thinking is that section 9.6.2.3 needs clarification and that the Satisfied Statement is a "roll-up" and not "about the AU". Here are notes from this discussion:

  1. A “publisher id” is specific to an AU. A publisher being an AU author. Blocks are combinations of AU’s and have ID’s but these ID’s. There is no “publisher id” for a block. A Block could conceivably be a mash up of AUs from different publishers.

  2. This forces us into choosing either a) an arbitrary or calculated publisher id of an AU within the Block or b) all of the AUs within a Block

  3. Similarly, this forces the choice up to each block in the case there are nested block as well to the course

  4. This means each course would have to list a single AU publisher id (dangerous) or all of the publisher ids (exhaustive)

  5. It appears that 9.6.2.3 was intended to be written for all statements that the LMS makes about the AU. A Satisfied statement is usually about BLOCKS. Which is where the Issue was raised.

  6. What we need to understand is what insight are we trying to gain from what we are listing in that (from a single course or block) satisfied Statement. Is it "This is the AU that had activity that ultimately satisfied the Statement?" If so, this is only the last AU, not the only.

Example Updates

In the course of the reviewing the JSON examples (see https://aicc.github.io/CMI-5_Spec_Current/samples/ ) it was determined that all of scenarios needed a course structure (cmi5.xml) examples to fully represent the contexts.


All Previous cmi5 Meeting Minutes

https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/wiki

cmi5 on GitHub:

http://aicc.github.io/CMI-5_Spec_Current/

⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️