CMI 5 Subgroup Meeting Notes – Mar 8th, 2024 - AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current GitHub Wiki
cmi5 Subgroup Meeting Notes– Mar 8th, 2024
- Andy Johnson
- Bill McDonald
- Andrew Chemey
- Florian Tolk
- Christopher Thompson
- Franklin Ludgood
- Jim Taite
- Megan Bohland
- Simon Hsu
- Yifei Dong
The group reviewed the issues backlog to identify possible updates for the pending IEEE cmi5 specification.
[Issue #395 - Should we require the triggering AU/Block Activity to be in the contextActivities for "Satisfied" statements?]](https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/issues/395)
- What statement triggered it?
- Actual Id for Object that Satisfaction is referring to?
- **An Array of all Objects (and/or all satisfying statements) that contributed to the Satisfaction event
- Id’s of activities or blocks
- Best Practice: GET query with related activities set to “true” to look up Satisfaction Statements.
- Other related issue – LMS issues Satisfied Statement for AU’s - https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current/issues/567
Best Practice #13 – LMS create “satisfied” statements for AU’s.
It is recommended that the LMS create a cmi5 “allowed” statement (with a satisfied verb) when an AU has met its moveOn criteria. The statement should also include the same AU activityId used in cmi5 defined statements.
(Re-Review) Issue #739 Images in course structure
- Reference A metadata spec – or provide a block?
- Why not just extend course structure? (since there so many possibilities for metadata)
- Possible Best Practice: Create a generic course metadata block?
- Define Keys for most common metadata standards?