Date Computation Problem Statement - jurisgpt/GrizlyUDVacator GitHub Wiki
Problem Statement
In calendaring and deadline‑driven applications—such as court‑deadline calculators—date handling is a critical foundation. However, most codebases suffer from inconsistent date representations:
- Multiple Input Types: Functions accept
str
,datetime.datetime
, ordatetime.date
interchangeably. - Redundant Conversions: Dates are frequently converted to strings and back, risking format mismatches.
- Scattered Logic: Parsing, validation, and business rules are implemented in different modules without a single source of truth.
These inconsistencies lead to:
-
Off‑by‑One and Mis‑Calculation Errors
A mis‑parsed string or an unexpecteddatetime
object can shift computed deadlines by days—potentially causing missed court filings or regulatory non‑compliance. -
Hidden Bugs & Maintenance Overhead
Redundant conversions and undocumented format assumptions make the code fragile, increase technical debt, and slow down feature development. -
Lack of Verifyable Correctness
Without a centralized API and strict typing, it is nearly impossible to achieve deterministic behavior across unit, integration, and simulation tests.
Goal: Define a single, canonical date type (datetime.date
), centralize all parsing and validation logic, and enforce strict typing and test coverage—thereby eliminating mission‑critical date errors once and for all.