Coq Call 2023 10 31 - coq/coq GitHub Wiki
- October 31st 4pm UTC+2 (Paris time zone offset)
- https://rdv2.rendez-vous.renater.fr/coq-call
Topics
- Dealing with fiat crypto timeouts (Gaëtan, 10min)
- How to implement adding a warning/docstring/deprecation to a library file (see #18193): by adding a new (generic) metadata method to library objects? And with which concrete syntax to associate metadata to a library file? (Hugo, 5-15 minutes)
- A preliminary implementation proposal for namespaces (CEP #25) (Hugo, 5-15 minutes)
- 8.19 will come with a
clearbody
attribute, can we seize this opportunity to provide alsosealed
/unsealed
attributes (Hugo, 5-10 minutes)
Roles
- Chairman: ?
- Secretary: ?
Notes
-
attending : Andres Erbsen, Gaetan Gilbert, Jason Gross, Hugo Herbelin, Pierre Marie Pédrot, Pierre Roux, Théo Zimmermann
-
Fiat crypto timeout
- GG : fiat crypto timeouts a lot (at 3 hours), even trying to use larger machines
what should we do, current situation not reasonnable - what about separating the job for bedrock2 ?
- not using bedrock master in fiat crypto
- JG : do a reduced CI target
- would require stats on what files trigger most CI failures
- TZ : won't have time to extract those data before a few months
- AE : takes much less than 3 hours on my machine
- JS : we are using "make -j1" on CI due to limited RAM on CI machines
- PMP : should we try -j2 on more beefy CI machines
- GG : remember having tried but without observing any effect
- TZ : should probably ping T Martinez
- TZ : would it make sense to have two targets:
- non beefy files compiled with -j2
- then beefy files compiled with -j1
- GG : we can just try -j2 and once it fails continue with -j1
- JG : have the bedrock2 CI job just compile the submodule of fiat crypto
- TZ : could we just have a specific branch of bedrock2 be used by fiat crypto
- no, too likely to break
- JG : will try to hack the CI in the coming weeks (AE could also do it)
- GG : fiat crypto timeouts a lot (at 3 hours), even trying to use larger machines
-
HH : Fiat crypto legacy currently failing on CI, submitted a PR to fiat crypto, it should just be merged
- AE : CI failing there
- HH : it seems to be using a too old version of Coq
-
HH : deprecating files
- PR : would like an attribute syntax (reusing deprecation(note="...", since="..."))
- PMP : would prefer a "string" rather than something without letters like "###[attribute]"
- TZ : something like
Module Attributes [deprecated(note="...", since="...")]
orLibrary Attributes [...]
-
JG : the attribute syntax should be extended to support warnings instead of just deprecation
- TZ : we already have a warning attribute to (dis)activate given warnings
- GG : OCaml call that "alert"
- JG : should give access to user to the warning categories
- GG : figure details in the PR
-
HH : clearbody, sealed/unsealed
- GG : current bug in clearbody, in
the definition should failSection S. #[clearbody] Let x := 0. Definition foo : x = 0 := eq_refl.
- PMP : could take the opportunity to add an "expand" attribute to Let to substitute or add a let/in when closing the section
- GG : current bug in clearbody, in
-
HH : namespaces, simple prototype
- PMP : probably not worth discussing right now as most interested people are not here (Cyril, Enrico,...)
- discussions on how to handle name clashes (allow them or not?)
- TZ : what was the status of the namespace CEP?