D8_InfrastructureReturns_BackboneLinks - Radega1993/the-one-scenario-corpus GitHub Wiki

Scenario D8 — D8_InfrastructureReturns_BackboneLinks

1. Overview

  • Scenario ID: D8
  • Name: D8_InfrastructureReturns_BackboneLinks
  • Family: Disaster
  • Settings file: corpus_v1/05_disaster/D8_InfrastructureReturns_BackboneLinks.settings

Objective

Partitioned disaster layout where infrastructure/backbone links reappear mid-simulation via external events.

2. Scenario configuration (core features)

Values below come from analysis/data/features.csv (raw) and the mapping to the 23-core subset.

Feature Value Comment
world_area 40000000 Total simulation area (m^2)
aspect_ratio 0.4 min(width,height)/max(width,height)
N 80 Total nodes
nrofHostGroups 2 Number of host groups
speed_mean 0.8 Mean configured speed (m/s)
wait_mean 135 Mean pause/wait time (s)
mm_WDM 0 WorkingDayMovement enabled (1/0)
mm_RWP 0 RandomWaypoint enabled (1/0)
mm_MapRoute 0 MapRouteMovement enabled (1/0)
mm_Cluster 1 ClusterMovement enabled (1/0)
mm_Bus 0 BusMovement enabled (1/0)
mm_Linear 0 LinearMovement enabled (1/0)
transmitRange 10 Interface range (m)
bufferSize 50000000 Node buffer (bytes)
transmitSpeed 2000000 Interface speed (bytes/s)
msgTtl 10000 Message TTL
event_interval_mean 112.5 Mean Events1 interval
event_size_mean 65000 Mean Events1 size (bytes)
nrof_event_generators 2 Number of event generators
pattern_burst 0 Burst windows in traffic (1/0)
pattern_hub_target 0 Hub-target traffic pattern (1/0)
workDayLength Not used in this scenario
ownCarProb Not used in this scenario
clusterRange_mean 350 Mean cluster radius if ClusterMovement

3. Mobility model

  • World size: 10000, 4000
  • Base speed range: Not recorded
  • Base wait range: Not recorded

Clustered partitions with ExternalEventsQueue introducing late inter-partition links.

DTN implication

This mobility design creates a constrained-contact disaster regime where connectivity depends on temporal bridges, dense local clusters, or opportunistic relays rather than stable end-to-end paths.

4. Traffic pattern

  • Events.nrof = 2
  • Events1.interval = 45, 180
  • Events1.size = 10k, 120k
  • Group.msgTtl = Not recorded

Traffic is configured as emergency-oriented load with timing/size parameters aligned to this disaster narrative.

DTN implication

Under Epidemic routing, these parameters amplify trade-offs between urgency and congestion: short opportunities improve fast deliveries in contact windows but can sharply increase redundancy or message expiration when partitions persist.

5. Expected network behavior

  • Contact opportunities are heterogeneous and depend on movement structure (clusters/partitions/routes).
  • Delivery is limited when temporal bridges are weak or TTL is very short.
  • Overhead rises quickly when flooding meets dense local contacts.
  • Delay can be bimodal: near-instant inside local contact islands, very high across partitions.

6. Role in the corpus

This scenario represents a specific disaster communication regime inside the corpus, contributing diversity relative to Urban/Campus/Social baselines and complementing other Disaster scenarios with a distinct structural stressor.

7. Distinguishing characteristics

  • Disaster-focused configuration with explicit structural constraints.
  • Mobility/traffic coupling designed to stress store-carry-forward behavior.
  • Relevant for evaluating robustness under disrupted or intermittent connectivity.

8. Correlation with other scenarios (core 23)

Using the 23-core feature space (analysis/data/correlation_pearson_core23.csv):

  • Most similar (top 3):
    • D2_PartitionedCity_MuleBridge — r ≈ 0.76
    • S1_StrongCommunities_SeparateClusters — r ≈ 0.55
    • T3_MixedBimodal_SmallAndLarge — r ≈ 0.36
  • Most different (top 3) (smallest |r|):
    • C1_Campus_ClassChange — r ≈ 0.00
    • T1_ManySmallMsgs_HighRate — r ≈ -0.01
    • D6_ShortTtlCritical_5to10min — r ≈ 0.01

Full pairwise correlations are available in analysis/reports/correlation_core23_report.txt and analysis/data/correlation_pearson_core23.csv.

Interpretation

The nearest scenarios share the same main structural levers (movement model family, host-group structure, and traffic scale), while near-zero correlations typically correspond to scenarios governed by orthogonal drivers (e.g., extreme range/speed, map routing, or different TTL/load regimes).

9. Cluster assignment

In the Ward k=7 clustering on the 23-core feature space (cluster_assignments_core23.csv), this scenario belongs to:

  • Cluster 2.

10. Simulation outputs (optional)

If routing simulations have been run and metrics were extracted (analysis/data/output_metrics.csv):

Metric Value
delivery_ratio 0.4607
latency_mean 2015.7523
overhead_ratio 79.3182
drop_ratio 22.976439790575917

Interpretation

These outputs are consistent with the scenario's disaster constraints: delivery reflects bridge availability and TTL feasibility; overhead reflects replication pressure in local contacts; missing latency/overhead entries indicate no successful deliveries in the analyzed run.

⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️