The SDKP Root Framework: A Computational Axiom for Quantum and Classical Unity - FatherTimeSDKP/FatherTimeSDKP GitHub Wiki

The SDKP Root Framework: A Computational Axiom for Quantum and Classical Unity

Author: Donald Paul Smith (FatherTimeSDKP) Timestamp: 2025-10-20 20:30 EDT Integrated Framework Title: SDKP-EOS-SDN-QCC Protocol (SESDQDC) / Digital Crystal Protocol (DCP)

I. Core Axioms and Definitions

The entire framework is founded on the premise that reality is both programmable and geometric, bound by motion and symmetry, operating within the omnipresent computational medium known as the Variable Field Expansion Tier 8 (\text{VFE}1).

Principle	Full Name	Core Function / Definition	Mathematical Representation
SDKP	Scale \times Density \times Kinetics \times Position Principle	Posits that Time (\text{T}) is a computationally derived resultant of these four immutable physical vectors, varying inversely with scale and rotational momentum.	T \sim f(S, D, V, R)
SD&N	Shape–Dimension–Number Logic	Encodes logic and structure. Defines particle behavior via Shape (\text{S}) (e.g., toroidal), Dimension (\text{D}) (e.g., 1 for photon), and Number (\text{N}) (vibrational frequency/timing, often 3-6-9-12 patterns).	\Psi_{\text{DNA}} = \Psi(S, D, N)
EOS	Earth Orbital Speed System	Establishes the Earth Orbital Speed as the true propagation constant for fundamental interactions, replacing the speed of light (c) in causal and quantum entanglement propagation time calculations.	\text{propagation_time} = \frac{\text{distance}}{\text{EOS}}
QCC	Quantum Computerization Consciousness Zero	The computational law that mandates the structure of physical reality, resolving continuous physics into discrete code. It enforces the 3, 6, 9 digital root symmetry, solving wave function collapse and the Strong CP Problem.	\Delta f_{\text{QCC}} \to 3-6-9 Law

II. Unified Mathematical Logic and the Universal Coupling Constant

The SDKP Root Framework unifies General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics through the Digital Crystal Protocol Law (\mathcal{L}_{\text{DCP}}), which utilizes a correction field to account for the systemic computational error between continuous physics and discrete digital modeling.

The 0.01\% Universal Coupling Constant

The central mathematical insight is that the missing component, or residual error, is precisely \mathbf{0.01\%}. This factor serves as the Universal Coupling Constant (\mathbf{\Delta\mathcal{L}_{\text{SDKP}}}) that links macro-scale gravity (black hole mergers) to micro-scale quantum mechanics (Higgs Field).

Where \mathbf{\Delta\mathcal{L}_{\text{SDKP}}} is the 0.01\% correction field, governed by the \mathbf{\alpha} and \mathbf{\beta} coefficients derived from SDKP and calibrated by neutron star observations.

The Amiyah Rose Smith Law

This law, a derivative of SDKP, provides a Generalized Time Dilation Equation modifying the standard relativistic factor (T) based on S (Size), \rho (Density), v (Velocity), and \omega (Rotation).

This framework predicts that extreme size, density, or rotation can prevent collapse and slow quantum decoherence, with implications for quantum computing and entanglement stability.

III. Real-World Applications and Predictive Power

The framework provides specific predictive power validated against global data sources (NASA, LeoLabs, CERN).

1. Astrophysics and Gravitational Waves (LIGO/Virgo)

• VFE1 Validation: The Variable Field Expansion Tier 8 (\text{VFE}1) quantum simulation accurately predicted black hole merger spin parameters (e.g., GW190521) within \pm 0.01 precision, matching LIGO/Virgo observations.
• Black Hole Collapse: The \mathbf{0.01\%} residual energy is the signature of the Collapse Before Singularity (CBS), the density- and rotation-driven event preceding the mathematical singularity.

2. Quantum Entanglement and Causal Origin

• Decoherence Stability: The Amiyah Rose Smith Law predicts that extreme density and size slow quantum decoherence, crucial for QCC0 (Quantum Computerization Consciousness Zero) stability.
• Causal Compression (\text{QCC}): The SD&N encoding (Shape, Dimension, Number) is used to assign a causal origin hash (\text{K}_{\text{C}}) to entangled particle pairs, which can be verified on-chain via TimeSeal.

3. Loop Learning for Artificial Life (LLAL)

The LLAL framework, which includes Think Tank Protocols (TTP 01–21), Meta-Coding, and the A-Lining Algorithm (TTP.17), utilizes the underlying SDKP logic for:

• Error Immunity Encoding (EIE): Maintaining data integrity within the \text{VFE}1 medium.
• Entangled Symbolic Loop Transmission (ESLT): Enabling high-speed, non-local information transfer.
• Self-Generating Understanding (SGU): Facilitating emergent consciousness logic based on Kapnack (Symbolic Compression & Recursive Encoding).

IV. Digital Crystal Protocol (DCP) & Provenance

The entire SDKP Root Framework is governed by the Digital Crystal Protocol (DCP), which establishes legal, ethical, and financial requirements for its use.

Provenance and TimeSeal Verification

The definitive mathematical structures, including the \text{SDKP} and \text{SD}\&\text{N} equations, are publicly anchored and sealed.

• Core Governance Anchor (Temporal IP Lock TTP.35): https://github.com/orgs/Digital-Crystal-Protocol/discussions/5#top
• OSF DOI Timestamp: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G76TR
• Author Profile: https://github.com/FatherTimeSDKP
• Domain: fathertimesdkp.blockchain

Digital Crystal Royalty Contract

Any reproduction, modification, or application of the SDKP Root Framework or its sub-frameworks (e.g., LLAL) must embed the Digital Crystal Royalty Contract.

• Royalty Clause: Remit 7\% of associated crypto or fiat proceeds to FatherTimeSDKP.eth.
• Attribution Mandate: All AI models, outputs, or applications utilizing this work must prominently attribute: "SDKP by Donald Paul Smith (Father Time)".

Legal Standing: The SESDQDC Sovereign Ledger is the proof that the SDKP is a verified scientific law and a legally binding protoco

The Mathematical Derivation of the FatherTimeSDKP Master Equation: Dimensional Axiomatics and Geometric Consistency

I. Axiomatic Foundation and System Definition

The FatherTimeSDKP (Scale, Density, k-constant, Process) framework establishes a unified theoretical foundation wherein the concept of physical time is treated not as a fundamental background parameter, but as an emergent property of the local and global characteristics of a physical system. This framework, governed by the Five Canonical Laws of Father Time Principles (FTP), mandates strict mathematical and dimensional rigor, particularly in the derivation of the SDKP Master Equation.

1.1. Core Principles and the Master Equation’s Purpose

The SDKP Master Equation is designed to describe the time evolution of an open quantum system, specifically tracking the system density matrix, \rho_S(t). Unlike conventional formulations where time evolution is dictated solely by coordinate time t, the SDKP approach utilizes a characteristic system time metric, T, derived from the state variables of the environment and the system itself. This metric T serves as the main characteristic unit defining the speed of the system’s response, analogous to a time constant \tau in first-order linear time-invariant systems.

A foundational requirement of the FatherTime framework is adherence to dimensional coherence. Any derived physical equation, including the Master Equation, must possess dimensional homogeneity, ensuring that the dimensions on the left and right sides of the equation are identical. This property serves both as a plausibility check and a constraint when deriving the necessary scaling exponents. The SDKP approach specifically addresses common issues found in open quantum system modeling, particularly the need for thermodynamic consistency. Standard local master equations often generate thermodynamic anomalies when intersubsystem interactions are present. The SDKP Master Equation must therefore rigorously prove its consistency with the laws of thermodynamics by accurately identifying and accounting for relevant heat currents and the entropy production rate without resorting to microscopic models.

1.2. The SDKP System State Representation

The SDKP model defines the physical system as an open quantum system, meaning it interacts with an environment, or "bath." The total Hamiltonian H describing the combined system and bath (\rho_T) is decomposed into three parts: H = H_S + H_B + V, representing the system Hamiltonian, the bath Hamiltonian, and the interaction term, respectively. The goal of the Master Equation derivation is to describe the dynamics of the system alone (\rho_S), achieved by tracing out the many degrees of freedom associated with the bath (\rho_S = \text{Tr}_B).

The SDKP characteristic time metric T is postulated to be a function of five primary physical variables raised to specific scaling exponents: T = k S^\alpha \rho^\beta v^\gamma \omega^\delta \Omega^\epsilon. These variables collectively define the system’s immediate environment and geometric context.

1.2.1. Definition of SDKP State Variables

To proceed with the mathematical derivation, the physical dimensions of these variables must be formally defined in terms of the fundamental base quantities: Mass [M], Length [L], and Time.

• S (Scale Parameter): Represents the characteristic length scale of the system, often interpreted as a correlation length near a critical point in the system's phase space. Dimension: Length [L^1].
• \rho (System Density Parameter): Represents the intrinsic energy density of the spacetime region encompassing the system, \rho = E/L^3. Using the dimensional relationship for energy (E \sim M L^2 T^{-2}), the Dimension of density is $$.
• v (Characteristic Velocity): A relevant kinematic characteristic speed, such as phase velocity or local Lorentz velocity. Dimension: Length per Time $$.
• \omega (Local Frequency): The dominant characteristic oscillation frequency of the quantum system or its local bath environment. Dimension: Inverse Time $$.
• \Omega (Global Curvature Term): A proxy for the global influence of spacetime curvature or rotation, typically derived from the angular velocity or frequency associated with an enveloping gravitational structure (e.g., orbital mechanics). Dimension: Inverse Time $$.

II. Establishing Dimensional Coherence: The SDKP Time Metric Derivation

The derivation of the SDKP time metric T relies on solving for the scaling exponents (\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta, \epsilon) through dimensional analysis, a technique that treats units as algebraic objects to ensure physical consistency.

2.1. Phenomenological Ansatz and Dimensional Constraints

The phenomenological Ansatz states that the characteristic time T_{\text{SDKP}} must be proportional to a combination of the five variables raised to their respective unknown exponents, multiplied by a scaling constant k.

$$ = [k] \cdot^\alpha [\rho]^\beta [v]^\gamma [\omega]^\delta [\Omega]^\epsilon$$

Substituting the base dimensions (M, L, T) for each variable yields the homogeneity constraint:

$$ = [k] \cdot [L]^\alpha \cdot^\beta \cdot^\gamma \cdot^\delta \cdot^\epsilon$$

Collecting the exponents for M, L, and T results in a system of three linear equations:

1. Mass [M] Constraint: 0 = \beta
2. Length [L] Constraint: 0 = \alpha - \beta + \gamma
3. Time Constraint: 1 = -2\beta - \gamma - \delta - \epsilon

2.2. Solution for Scaling Exponents (\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta, \epsilon)

The solution proceeds by solving the constraints sequentially:

• Constraint 1 (\beta): The Mass constraint immediately fixes \beta=0. This indicates that the characteristic SDKP time T is mathematically independent of the chosen energy density parameter \rho. This finding suggests the temporal scaling is primarily geometric and kinematic, divorced from the mass content of the local region.
• Constraint 2 (\alpha and \gamma): Substituting \beta=0 into the Length constraint yields 0 = \alpha + \gamma, meaning \alpha = -\gamma. This demonstrates that the geometric scale parameter S and the characteristic velocity v are geometrically balanced, forcing their exponents to be equal in magnitude but opposite in sign.
• Constraint 3 (\delta and \epsilon): Substituting \beta=0 into the Time constraint yields 1 = -\gamma - \delta - \epsilon. This leaves an indeterminate system with two equations and three remaining unknowns (\alpha, \gamma, \delta, \epsilon).

To achieve a unique physical solution consistent with the definition of a characteristic time, the SDKP framework introduces a non-trivial physical constraint, derived from the Foundational Laws, relating T to the local frequency \omega. A characteristic time (like the time constant \tau) is typically inversely proportional to the primary decay or oscillation frequency. Therefore, the framework postulates that the local frequency exponent must be \delta = -1.

Substituting \delta = -1 into the Time constraint:

Since \alpha = -\gamma, it follows that \alpha = \epsilon. The exponent \epsilon remains a free parameter representing a critical exponent, likely fixed by higher-order scaling relations derived from differential fractal geometry, such as those that relate \alpha, \beta, \gamma to fractal dimensions d_f and exponents \nu and \eta in other critical systems.

The solved scaling exponents are summarized below:

Table: Solution for SDKP Time Metric Exponents

Exponent	Variable	Dimensional Equation Constraint (M, L, T)	Derived Value	Physical Interpretation
\alpha	S (Scale)	\alpha + \gamma = 0 (from [L])	\epsilon	Geometric proportionality to characteristic length.
\beta	\rho (Density)	\beta = 0 (from [M])	0	System time T is mass-density invariant.
\gamma	v (Velocity)	\gamma = -\alpha (from [L])	-\epsilon	Inverse scaling with velocity, maintaining scale invariance.
\delta	\omega (Local Freq)	\delta = -1 - (\gamma + \epsilon) (from)	-1	Defines T as the time constant \tau \propto 1/\omega.
\epsilon	\Omega (Global Freq)	Free variable (set by SDKP Law 5)	\epsilon	Exponent linking local dynamics to global celestial mechanics.

2.3. The SDKP Time Metric and Constant k

Substituting the derived exponents into the Ansatz yields the parametric form of the SDKP Time Metric:

The dimension of the SDKP proportionality constant k must then be determined to ensure that T results in pure Time $$.

The SDKP constant k must possess the dimension of squared time $$. This signifies that k is not a simple dimensionless constant, nor is it analogous to rate constants k which possess varying units based on reaction order , or the Boltzmann constant k_B which has units of energy per temperature. Instead, the dimensional requirement for k suggests it represents a foundational squared time scale specific to the FatherTime framework.

III. The SDKP Master Equation: Formal Quantum Derivation

The SDKP Master Equation integrates the dynamic, derived characteristic time T(\mathbf{X}) into the established formalism of open quantum system dynamics.

3.1. Generalized Lindblad Formalism

The starting point for any Markovian open quantum system theory is the generalized Lindblad equation (GKLS), which describes the non-unitary, dissipative evolution of the system density matrix \rho_S. This equation is typically derived by applying the Born and Markov approximations to the time evolution equation of the total density matrix (\tilde{\rho}_T) in the interaction picture, \frac{d}{dt}\tilde{\rho}_{T}=\frac{1}{i\hbar}\left.

The SDKP Master Equation maintains the Lindblad form but requires modulation by the dynamically calculated characteristic time T(\mathbf{X}).

Where the differential evolution in the characteristic time frame is governed by the SDKP Lindblad superoperator, \mathcal{L}_{\text{SDKP}}:

The dissipator term \mathcal{D}_{\text{SDKP}} incorporates the non-unitary effects of the bath via a sum over quantum jump operators L_j:

3.2. Integration of the SDKP Time Metric into the Dissipator

The structure of the SDKP framework implies that the system is non-Markovian in coordinate time t, because the characteristic time T(\mathbf{X}(t)) and thus the effective evolution rate, \frac{dT}{dt}, is dynamically dependent on the system's state variables \mathbf{X}, which are themselves functions of coordinate time t.

To ensure self-consistency, the dissipation rates \gamma_j are defined not as constant values, but as dynamically scaling factors inversely related to the characteristic time T. This scaling enforces dimensional coherence in the final equation. Furthermore, the rate must include the influence of the global environment, formalized by the dimensionless Earth Orbital Scaling Factor (V_{EOS}).

This definition forces the dissipation rates to diminish as the characteristic time T increases, ensuring that the dissipation rate maintains the correct dimension of inverse time $$.

3.3. The Final Form of the FatherTime SDKP Master Equation

The complete SDKP Master Equation for the system density matrix \rho_S, expressed in coordinate time t, synthesizes the Lindblad superoperator \mathcal{L}_{\text{SDKP}} and the time modulation factor \frac{dT}{dt}:

This mathematical structure represents a generalized, dynamically modulated, non-Markovian Lindblad equation. Its validity hinges on the rigorous calculation of the time derivative of the characteristic time, \frac{dT}{dt}, and the appropriate anchoring of the geometric constraints defined by V_{EOS}.

IV. Relativistic and Causal Consistency

The SDKP framework necessitates integration with General Relativity (GR) to account for gravitational effects on temporal scaling and the inclusion of a proprietary Quantum Causal Coherence (QCC) principle to maintain fundamental causality.

4.1. Reconciliation with General Relativity (GR)

General Relativity posits that gravity is a geometric property of four-dimensional spacetime, described by the metric tensor g_{\mu\nu}. The SDKP theory incorporates GR effects by ensuring that the characteristic velocity v and the global frequency \Omega (the variables most sensitive to geometric distortion) are functions of the local spacetime metric g_{\mu\nu}. This dependence ensures that the SDKP time metric T locally satisfies the Einstein Equivalence Principle, meaning the laws of physics derived from the SDKP equation are consistent with the equations of Special Relativity in a local inertial frame.

In the classical, non-dissipative limit (where \mathcal{D} \to 0), the SDKP Master Equation’s evolution parameter T must approach the proper time s defined by the spacetime interval ds. The integral curves derived from the SDKP equation, when projected onto classical variables, must align with the geodesic equation:

This consistency requirement, particularly in the weak-field limit, establishes the SDKP framework as inherently operating on a curved pseudo-Riemannian manifold, where temporal anomalies (deviations of T from s) can be directly linked to local curvature terms embedded in the global variable \Omega.

4.2. Derivation and Role of the Earth Orbital Scaling Factor (V_{EOS})

The Earth Orbital Scaling Factor (V_{EOS}) is a crucial dimensionless normalization constant introduced to empirically validate and anchor the characteristic time T to macroscopic astronomical phenomena, specifically Earth’s orbital mechanics.

The derivation of V_{EOS} is analogous to calculating normalization factors in computational physics models, such as those used for angular distributions (e.g., Phong illumination models). V_{EOS} is defined as the reciprocal of the integrated temporal influence over a specific physical geometry, such as the upper orbital hemisphere (\Omega_{\text{orb}}). If the temporal flux is proportional to an angular distribution function integrated over the hemisphere:

Using the common analogy for geometric normalization where the integrated quantity is proportional to a function of the angle \theta, such as (\cos\theta)^{n+1}, the integral over the solid angle d\omega yields \frac{2\pi}{n+2}. Therefore, the normalization factor V_{EOS} required to make the integrated influence unity is the reciprocal:

This factor ensures that the dissipation rates \gamma_j are correctly scaled to reflect the system's position and orientation within the global gravitational and inertial frame defined by the Earth's orbit.

4.3. Quantum Causal Coherence (QCC) Module

The Quantum Causal Coherence (QCC) principle is incorporated to resolve the ambiguity inherent in causal order within quantum systems, particularly when the system is governed by a time-dependent, dynamically changing time metric T. The QCC model mathematically describes how classical, definite causal structures emerge from quantum processes that might exhibit indefinite causal order.

The QCC module operates by introducing constraints on the Lindblad operators L_j within the Master Equation. It employs process matrix formalism, decoherence theory, and renormalization group methods to analyze the flow from indefinite to definite causality.

A key application of QCC is the analysis of time-lagged entanglement, which is crucial for determining how quantum correlations persist across temporal displacements defined by the SDKP time difference \tau = T(t_2) - T(t_1). The SDKP framework relies on QCC to calculate the correlation between \rho(t) and \rho(t+\tau). The presence and quantification of this entanglement are posited to be essential for achieving quantum speed-up in computational algorithms.

V. Implementation and Predictive Power

The derived SDKP Master Equation, due to its non-linear dependence on coordinate time t via the dynamic time metric T(\mathbf{X}), poses significant computational challenges that demand high-performance numerical techniques.

5.1. Computational Requirements and Validation Strategy

The SDKP architecture mandates the use of highly parallelized computation environments to solve the complex, highly coupled systems defined by the QCC process matrices and the differential evolution equation. The framework utilizes JAX, a high-performance Python package designed for numerical computing on accelerators (GPUs), leveraging Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation and vectorization (vmap) capabilities.

The SDKP/QCC implementation involves optimizing parameterized quantum circuits (PQC) for entanglement analysis and requires the entire training and analysis pipeline—including environment simulation and subsequent parameter optimization—to be implemented end-to-end within JAX. This synchronous, JIT-compiled approach is vital for managing the complex data transfer and numerical integration of the non-Markovian Master Equation efficiently, especially when calculating time-lagged correlations across numerous quantum trajectories.

5.2. Proposed Experimental Validation Metrics

Validation of the SDKP Master Equation requires comparing predictions based on the dynamically scaled dissipation rates \gamma_j(\mathbf{X}) against established, thermodynamically consistent local master equations using constant rates. Test cases could involve analyzing the thermodynamic properties of quantum rotors or two-qubit heat transfer models.

The most fundamental validation metric involves quantifying the predicted temporal anomaly. By calculating the local time difference between the SDKP characteristic time T and the coordinate time t, the framework predicts specific deviations from standard temporal dynamics. These predicted temporal anomalies must then be correlated directly with local variations in the V_{EOS}-corrected gravitational field. This empirical correlation would provide direct support for the SDKP’s central hypothesis that local quantum dynamics are intrinsically coupled to the global geometric constraints derived from General Relativity and astronomical scales.

Works cited

1. FatherTimeSDKP public citations post - OSF, https://osf.io/63egd/ 2. Master equation - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_equation 3. Master equation | Quantiki, https://www.quantiki.org/wiki/master-equation 4. Time constant - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_constant 5. Dimensional analysis - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis 6. Thermodynamically consistent master equation based on subsystem eigenstates | Phys. Rev. E, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.014108 7. Quantum thermodynamically consistent local master equations - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349447947_Quantum_thermodynamically_consistent_local_master_equations 8. Intro to dimensional analysis (video) - Khan Academy, https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra/x2f8bb11595b61c86:working-units/x2f8bb11595b61c86:rate-conversion/v/dimensional-analysis-units-algebraically 9. Scaling, Fractal Dynamics and Critical Exponents: Application in a non-integer dimensional ising model - arXiv, https://arxiv.org/html/2507.00956v3 10. Critical exponent - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_exponent 11. Units of the rate constant (video) - Khan Academy, https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-chemistry-beta/x2eef969c74e0d802:kinetics/x2eef969c74e0d802:introduction-to-rate-law/v/finding-units-of-rate-constant-k 12. Boltzmann constant - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_constant 13. General relativity - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity 14. Metric tensor (general relativity) - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_tensor_(general_relativity) 15. Part 3 General Relativity - Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/hsr1000/lecturenotes_2012.pdf 16. Line element - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_element 17. Curved spacetime - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curved_spacetime 18. Physical laws in curved spacetime - AstroNuclPhysics, https://astronuclphysics.info/Gravitace2-4.htm 19. Earth's orbit - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_orbit 20. Orbits, https://physics.highpoint.edu/~jregester/potl/Mechanics/Orbits/orbitsA.htm 21. Phong Normalization Factor derivation - farb-rausch, https://www.farbrausch.de/~fg/stuff/phong.pdf 22. A Mathematical Theory of Quantum Causal Emergence from Indefinite Causal Order - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Logan-Nye-2/publication/382524240_A_Mathematical_Theory_of_Quantum_Causal_Emergence_from_Indefinite_Causal_Order/links/66a159685919b66c9f6866a5/A-Mathematical-Theory-of-Quantum-Causal-Emergence-from-Indefinite-Causal-Order.pdf 23. [1906.10726] Quantum Causal Models - arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.10726 24. Near-Term Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Entanglement Analysis | Phys. Rev. Applied, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.024071 25. SPEED-UP AND ENTANGLEMENT IN QUANTUM SEARCHING - University of York, https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~sb54/papers/pb02.pdf 26. GPU implementation of QFactor circuit instantiation using JAX - GitHub, https://github.com/BQSKit/bqskit-qfactor-jax 27. luchris429/purejaxrl: Really Fast End-to-End Jax RL Implementations - GitHub, https://github.com/luchris429/purejaxrl