Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try to avoid auto-detecting Fields for Record types #3736

Closed
cowtowncoder opened this issue Jan 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Try to avoid auto-detecting Fields for Record types #3736

cowtowncoder opened this issue Jan 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
2.15 Issues planned for 2.15
Milestone

Comments

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

(note: inspired by #3352)

Although Record types do have internal fields for storing data, these should never need to be accessed.
Access may seem to "work" in some cases (if strong module constraints are disabled) but are more likely to cause issues when module access checks are fully enforced.

So let's see if we can reduce/remove Field introspection via POJOPropertiesCollector.

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder added to-evaluate Issue that has been received but not yet evaluated 2.15 Issues planned for 2.15 and removed to-evaluate Issue that has been received but not yet evaluated labels Jan 16, 2023
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder changed the title Try to avoid auto-detecting `Fields for Record types Try to avoid auto-detecting Fields for Record types Jan 16, 2023
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder added this to the 2.15.0 milestone Jan 16, 2023
@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder changed the title Try to avoid auto-detecting Fields for Record types Try to avoid auto-detecting Fields for Record types May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.15 Issues planned for 2.15
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant