JsonProperty.Access.READ_ONLY fails with collections when a property name is specified

[Yona-Appletree]

Very similar issue to #1805, but when a property name is specified and MapperFeature.USE_GETTERS_AS_SETTERS is enabled:

static class Foo {
    @JsonProperty(value = "list", access = JsonProperty.Access.READ_ONLY)
    List<Long> getList() {
        return Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList());
    }
}

Fails with com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: (was java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException) (through reference chain: com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.ReadOnlyDeserWithNameTest$Foo["list"]->java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableRandomAccessList[0])

Here's the test:

private final ObjectMapper MAPPER = jsonMapperBuilder().configure(MapperFeature.USE_GETTERS_AS_SETTERS, true).build();

public void testReadOnly() throws Exception
{
    String payload = "{\"list\":[1,2,3,4]}";
    Foo foo = MAPPER.readValue(payload, Foo.class);
    assertTrue("List should be empty", foo.getList().isEmpty());
}

[cowtowncoder]

Thank you for reporting this. I hope to have a look relatively soon.

[Yona-Appletree]

I went ahead and did my best at fixing this myself and put in a new test and pull request. I'm sure it's not quite up-to-par, but hopefully it can help you get started.

[cowtowncoder]

Relatively soon was not to happen, but issue is on W-I-P/TODO list at https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-future-ideas/wiki/Jackson-Work-in-Progress
(fwtw)

[cowtowncoder]

Added (failing) unit test from #2284, to make it easier to solve this, whether by using (parts of) PR or not.

[cowtowncoder]

I think I managed to fix this along with #2118 and #2719, for 2.12.0 (fix in 2.12 branch)