Project Meeting 2021.12.02 - ActivitySim/activitysim GitHub Wiki

Agenda

  • Update on the visualizer development
    • Model summaries are created in output folder and simwrapper reads the summaries to create plots
    • SimWrapper can be installed via pip
    • To create dashboard, add the "summarize" step at the end of the model list in settings.yaml
    • Summary csvs are created using python expressions in summarize.csv
      • These expressions have access to all of the data in an activitysim run including skims
    • Segmentations by demographic group, e.g. income, are under development
    • The local machine creating the dashboard acts as a file server is created to run the dashboard on the web as a background process.
      • Hosting on the cloud should be no problem
    • Request for "best practice" recommendations to handle creation and sharing (internally and externally) of dashboards
      • Berlin has a dedicated server that holds all model runs and acts as the dashboard server
    • Request to add more description text options for plots
    • Request for comparison between scenarios
    • Previous request for filtering / brushing is currently under development
    • Recent infrastructure bill mentions Travel Demand Data and Modeling, including web-based evaluation tools (section 11205)
    • Some more testing is still needed
    • Goal is to wrap up phase 1 development by the end of the year
  • Vehicle type model development
    • Model has been added to mtc example
    • New model, vehicle_choice, was created and a new "canonical table" called vehicles was added
    • There is one single vehicle_choice.yaml, and to change between option 2 or option 4, the user would change the spec and coefficient csv options to the one they want in the vehicle_choice.yaml
    • Would like some automated code to create the spec file
    • Need to confirm that model specification has been finalized
    • Combinatorial effects are treated dynamically in the CDAP model, could we take that implementation to improve the vehicle type model?
    • Will consider alternative options to make specification more extensible before giving go-ahead for code review
    • Suggest using model option 4 for model calibration and validation
    • How will regional differences be implemented and are they important?
    • Propose renaming of model to vehicle_type_choice
  • RFP has been released