Project Meeting 2021.01.14 - ActivitySim/activitysim GitHub Wiki

5b/6a Task 1 Project Management (milestone)

  • Contracting
    • Bench contract going out next week
    • Partner MOA/payment agreement being finalized
    • What term should the MOA be? 1 year, 2, year, 3 year?
    • Can be different for different agencies
    • If signed, commits the agency to paying for that period and gives them a vote in the PMC
    • Plan to get contracts signed and executed July 1
    • Ohio DOT probably join July 1
    • MWCOG probably join July 1 and SERPM maybe next year
  • Released code, see releases
    • Will create issue for additional ARC submodels that need estimation integration
    • It would be good to have scripts to reformat household travel surveys into ActivitySim format for estimation
    • We have some for SEMCOG that could be cleaned up and shared
    • Would be good to walk through an example, maybe SEMCOG auto ownership, on an upcoming call to help socialize the new functionality

5b Task 2 Strategic Planning (milestone)

  • I still need to review V3

6a Task 2 Complete Estimation Mode (milestone)

6a Task 3 Telecommute Model in Cooperation with SEMCOG (milestone)

  • Telecommute (work_from_home and telecommute_frequency) model programmed, see example
  • Using SANDAG model specification and coefficients and faked additional MTC data (person occupancy)
  • Would be good to have a real example with MTC data and estimation for distribution
  • SFCTA, MTC, and SANDAG all have rMove surveys and maybe they could cooperate to set this up with consultant support
  • Survey has telecommute minutes each day (not just T/F for day)
  • @Joe to talk with Bay area partners and circle back
  • SEMCOG to go ahead with using the new model and then we'll circle back on how to finish the contribution for distribution

6a Task 4 Transit Pass Ownership Model in Cooperation with SEMCOG (milestone)

  • Joel working on design to share next week

6a Task 5 Performance Enhancements (milestone)

  • Jeff profile the existing examples to identify useful areas for improvement
  • @Stefen and @Guy share examples for testing
  • Discussed the PSRC two zone system location sampling runtime issues
    • Number of zones shouldn't be a limiting factor, i.e. microzones or parcels should work
    • Do we want to support parcels? It may have a different design than just microzones
    • Can we create a MAZ version of TM2 for testing?
    • Let's keep discussing a good solution and Stefan to share more thoughts via email
    • I'll talk with Doyle about design / improvements ideas

6a Task 8 Maintenance and Support (milestone)

  • Nothing to report